Chapter 31. Graph Partitioning

When the JanusGraph cluster consists of multiple storage backend instances, the graph is partitioned across those machines. Since JanusGraph stores the graph in an adjacency list representation the assignment of vertices to machines determines the partitioning. By default, JanusGraph uses a random partitioning strategy that randomly assigns vertices to machines. Random partitioning is very efficient, requires no configuration, and results in balanced partitions. However, random partitioning results in less efficient query processing as the JanusGraph cluster grows to accommodate more graph data because of the increasing cross-instance communication required to retrieve the query’s result set. Explicit graph partitioning can ensure that strongly connected and frequently traversed subgraphs are stored on the same instance thereby reducing the communication overhead significanly.

To enable explicit graph partitioning in JanusGraph, the following configuration options must be set when the JanusGraph cluster is initialized.

cluster.partition = true
cluster.max-partitions = 32
ids.flush = false

The configuration option max-partitions controls how many virtual partitions JanusGraph creates. This number should be roughly twice the number of storage backend instances. If the JanusGraph cluster is expected to grow, estimate the size of the cluster in the foreseeable future and take this number as the baseline. Setting this number too large will unnecessarily fragment the cluster which can lead to poor performance.

Because explicit graph partitioining controls the assignment of vertices to storage instances it cannot be enabled once a JanusGraph cluster is initialized. Likewise, the number of virtual partitions cannot be changed without reloading the graph.

Explicit graph partitioning can only enabled against storage backends that support ordered key storage:

  • HBase: Always supports explicit graph partitioining
  • Cassandra: Must be configured to use ByteOrderedPartitioner in oder to support explicit graph partitioning

There are two aspects to graph partitioning which can be individually controlled: edge cuts and vertex cuts.

31.1. Edge Cut

In assigning vertices to partitions one strives to optimize the assignmet such that frequently co-traversed vertices are hosted on the same machine. Assume vertex A is assigned to machine 1 and vertex B is assigned to machine 2. An edge between the vertices is called a cut edge because its end points are hosted on separate machines. Traversing this edge as part of a graph query requires communication between the machines which slows down query processing. Hence, it is desirable to reduce the edge cut for frequently traversed edges. That, in turn, requires placing the adjacent vertices of frequently traversed edges in the same partition.

Vertices are placed in a partition by way of the assigned vertex id. a partition is essentially a sequential range of vertex ids. To place a vertex in a particular partition, JanusGraph chooses an id from the partition’s range of vertex ids. JanusGraph controls the vertex-to-partition assigment through the configured placement strategy. By default, vertices created in the same transaction are assigned to the same partition. This strategy is easy to reason about and works well in situations where frequently co-traversed vertices are created in the same transaction - either by optimizing the loading strategy to that effect or because vertices are naturally added to the graph that way. However, the strategy is limited, leads to imbalanced partitions when data is loaded in large transactions and not the optimal strategy for many use cases. The user can provide a use case specific vertex placement strategy by implementing the IDPlacementStrategy interface and registering it in the configuration through the ids.placement option.

When implementing IDPlacementStrategy, note that partitions are identified by an integer id in the range from 0 to the number of configured virtual partitions minus 1. For our example configuration, there are partitions 0, 1, 2, 3, ..31. Partition ids are not the same as vertex ids. Edge cuts are more meaningful when the JanusGraph servers are on the same hosts as the storage backend. If you have to make a network call to a different host on each hop of a traversal, the benefit of edge cuts and custom placement strategies can be largely nullified.

31.2. Vertex Cut

While edge cut optimization aims to reduce the cross communication and thereby improve query execution, vertex cuts address the hotspot issue caused by vertices with a large number of incident edges. While vertex-centric indexes effectively address query performance for large degree vertices, vertex cuts are needed to address the hot spot issue on very large grahps.

Cutting a vertex means storing a subset of that vertex’s adjacency list on each partition in the graph. In other words, the vertex and its adjacency list is partitioned thereby effectively distributing the load on that single vertex across all of the instances in the cluster and removing the hot spot.

JanusGraph cuts vertices by label. A vertex label can be defined as partitioned which means that all vertices of that label will be partitiond across the cluster in the manner described above.

mgmt = graph.openManagement()

In the example above, product is defined as a partitioned vertex label whereas user is a normal label. This configuration is beneficial for situations where there are thousands of products but millions of users and one records transactions between users and products. In that case, the product vertices will have a very high degree and the popular products turns into hot spots if they are not partitioned.

31.3. Graph Partitioning FAQ

31.3.1. Random vs. Explicit Partitioning

When the graph is small or accommodated by a few storage instances, it is best to use random partitioning for its simplicity. As a rule of thumb, one should strongly consider enabling explicit graph partitioning and configure a suitable partitioning heuristic when the graph grows into the 10s of billions of edges.